Gay marriage

It's strange; during a life when there are two (or many more) sides to every story, and nothing is simple, some confusing issues have presented themselves in some pretty binary ways. What a relief to my brain, a brain that can never seem to find a handle by which to wrangle things.

Gay marriage is one of those things.

With all the arms, legs, finger, toes and other appendages this issue displays, reasonable people can always find something about which to disagree. Religion, social norms, love, civil rights,
the very definition of social institutions; what a varied gumbo of discourse awaits the dumb bunny who thinks he can make sense of it all.

I say that having been on both sides of the issue in my head. Like President Obama, my thoughts on the issue "evolve." And I think you, him and I all are aware what a flimsy state of affairs that is. But then again, if you're not sure, you're not sure. It smacks of a shortcut to profess a position on these things if you're not certain where you stand. Unfortunately, there's very little room for uncertainty on any issue under the sun, especially in politics. Also unfortunately, some things are too complicated to find an easy handle.

Yeah yeah yeah, life's complicated. There a point to be made here, Tom?

Why yes, voice of cynicism and impatience, there is. My point is that with all the swirling, logical distractions that get kicked up in the debate about gay marriage, the thing I keep circling back to, the one question that seems to be the key to the whole thing for each person is this: do you think a gay person's idea of love is any different or lesser than heterosexual love? Is their idea of love any less genuine than yours?

Because if you agree that it is equal to your own genuine, fallible, brilliant, crazy, breathtaking, fluctuating heart's cry, then it's a very short and direct path to "granting" "them" the same rights and responsibilities that "we" have. Sorry for all the quotes, but it's amazing how quickly the terminology of division presents itself, with "them, they, us, we, their and our" all slicing up a pie that in reality is big enough for everybody, and I'm not comfortable with it.

But yeah, it always comes back to that for me. If it's real, then you've got to admit that gay marriage is just as valid as hetero, and following that truth where it leads.

If not, then no. But good luck shoving that rock up that particular hill. You try to look these people (see, I'm doing it again) in the eye and tell them that what they call love isn't as good as what you call it. I wanna be there for that, because sparks are gonna FLY son! You start chipping away at that load-bearing pillar of self, and you're not very far from denying someone's entire validity as an entity in a much larger sense, and even the weakest among us will fight that with the utmost ferocity.

What do you think?